Thoughts of American political scientist Samuel Phillips Huntington, who increased Islamophobia, discredited socialism, and established American policies in the world

Samuel Phillips Huntington, born on April 18, 1927 in New York City, was a world-renowned American political scientist, consultant and academic. He worked for more than half a century at Harvard University where he was the director of Harvard's Center for International Affairs and the Albert J. Weatherhead III was a university professor. During the presidency of Jimmy Carter, Huntington was the White House coordinator of security planning for the National Security Council. Huntington is best known for his 1993 theory, Clash of Civilizations, otherwise known as the COC of the post-Cold War New World Order.

Samuel Phillips Huntington argued that future wars would be fought not between countries, but between cultures, and that Islamic civilization would become the greatest threat to Western dominance over the world. Huntington is credited with shaping American ideas on civil-military relations, political development, and comparative government and helping to disseminate them widely. According to the Open Syllabus Project, Huntington is the second most cited author on college syllabi for political science courses. Huntington has a big role in increasing Islamophobia and defaming socialism. They have been great carriers of American dominance, culture and capitalism in the world. Some thoughts of Samuel Phillips Huntington -

The ability of Asian regimes to resist Western human rights pressures was strengthened by several factors. American and European businesses were desperate to rapidly expand their trade and investment in these

If you tell people the world is complex, you're not doing your job as a social scientist. They already know it's complicated. Your job is to distill it, to simplify it.

Dangerous future conflicts are likely to arise from the interplay of Western arrogance, Islamic intolerance and Cynic assertiveness.

Flags matter in the post-Cold War world, and so do other symbols of cultural identity, including crosses, crescents, and even head coverings, because culture matters, and cultural identity is what is most meaningful to most people .

There can be no true friends without true enemies. Unless we hate what we are not, we cannot love what we are.

Multiculturalism is fundamentally anti-European civilization. This is basically an anti-Western ideology.

God and Caesar, Church and State, spiritual authority and temporal authority have been the prevalent dualisms in Western culture. Only in Hindu civilization were religion and politics so clearly separated. In Islam, God is Caesar. In China and Japan, Caesar is God. In Orthodoxy, God is Caesar's junior partner.

Becoming a modern society is about industrialization, urbanization and increasing levels of literacy, education and wealth. In contrast, the qualities that make a society Western are typical classical heritage, Christianity, separation of church and state, rule of law, civil society, etc.

Hypocrisy, double standards and but-nots are the price of universalist posturing. Democracy is promoted, but not when it brings Islamic fundamentalists to power, non-proliferation is promoted for Iran and Iraq, but not for Israel, free trade is the elixir of economic growth, but for agriculture. No, human rights are an issue for China, but not for Saudi Arabia; aggression against oil-owning Kuwaitis is largely disapproved, but not against non-oil-owning Bosnians. Double standards in practice are the inevitable price of universal standards in theory.

The power remains strong even in darkness, it starts evaporating when exposed to sunlight.

The borders of Islam are bloody and so are its interiors. The core problem for the West is not Islamic fundamentalism. This is Islam, a separate civilization whose people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and suffer from the inferiority of their power.

The West conquered the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion but by its superiority in applying organized violence. Western people often forget this fact and non-Western people never do.

Some Westerners have argued that the West does not have a problem with Islam but only with violent Islamic extremists. 1400 years of history shows something else.